A thought from Facebook

It's not often you come across a real intellectual gem in the almost infinitely stupid and ill-conceived ramblings of facebook. We all know how much ignorance and stupidity is spat onto YouTube from the vapid minds of socially retarded internet users, but let's not underestimate the ability of your average facebookee to make a total, utter idiot of themselves by spilling their often racist, biggoted, irrational ideals all over their favourite group and/or Page.

This then, offers hope that there are people out there who aspire to be more than the common ignoramus.

"""Although I'd like to hear more global warming "skeptics" more vocally (1) acknowledge that there are severe climate problems that will need to be dealt with, even if they don't believe they're manmade (2) acknowledge renewable energy technologies are desirable even if they don't believe non-renewable energies are contributing to global warming (3) acknowledge that regulating pollution is desirable for many reasons, even if they don't believe global warming is one of them and (4) actually do more than just acknowledge these things but be active in these causes."""

Truer words were never spoken. I shan't publicise the author of the above, for fear of revealing personal information. But what he says is clearly true, and even Top Gear have shown some degree of recognition of this particular way of thinking. Let us not forget, that despite Herr Klarkson's continuous denial of climate change, Top Gear has on several occasions made realistic and sensible recommendations on saving petrol, on the viability of Hydrogen fuel cells, and cars which appear to be more 'green' than they actually are (case in point, Toyota Prius... which averaged a poor 45mpg when he took it for a road test). When they reviewed the Tesla, they didn't have a problem with the car, only the recharge time.

All things considered, people should, and therefore won't, take the view above. That even the most hardened, closed minded climate sceptics should be ready to acknowledge the undeniable benefits of renewable sources, and everything else written in that lovely little quote up there.

Reality? People continue to ignore it, do nothing, exist as sheep-like, ignorant entities and will in a few years, end up swimming to work when the sea level rise reaches London.

-Neop (Is buying shares in raft making companies)

A piece of evening inspiration

Here's something from The World According to Clarkson (bought by an extremely thoughtful girlfriend):

"Boredom forces you to ring people you haven't seen for eighteen years and halfway through the conversation you remember why you left it so long. Boredom means you start to red not only mail-order catalogues but also the advertising inserts that fall on the floor. Boredom gives you half a mind to get a gun and go berserk in the local shopping centre, and you know where this is going. Eventually, boredom means you will take up golf."

All too true, it seems. I thought this little smidge of wisdom might provide some brain food for the bored-er people out there.

To be honest, this book seems a pretty good read for anyone who's bored, not-bored, happy, sad, literate, strange, or otherwise just wants some alternative amusement. For those less informed among you, it's simply a collection of rants from the ever-so-famous curly haired tall man of Top Gear fame (/infamy).

There seems to be an all too rare breed of humans who sit down and think a bit about the world and how it works, and Jeremy seems to be one of those people. Ok, fine, granted, in truth, and at the end of the day, (sub-clause cliché record broken?) I don't agree with everything he says. Light aircraft ARE fun, BMWs ARE for fat knobs who can't drive, and global warming WILL kill everyone (although I sometimes wonder if that's altogether a bad thing. If you've driven through Guildford in rush-hour, I guarantee you'll share that same occasional sentiment for mass genocide). But so what if he has different opinions? I'm not about to model myself after somebody else in a thoroughly clone-like manner, especially when one of the things I admire Clarkson for is his opinionation; HIS OWN opinions mind.

The point is, that here's a man who's all for freedom of speech, freedom to take-the-piss, and freedom to throw yourself head first out of a plane without some bloody health and safety "executive" telling you "you might die".

Sadly, reading through this I'm finding it hard to fully convey my meaning. I'll leave you with a short thought.

We're increasingly engaged in a society where idiots, chavs, and general social-degenerates are no longer killed off at a young age and removed from the gene pool. It's easy for stupid people to sail through life, blissfully unaware that they're making it thoroughly unpleasant for those who do, actually care. Far from saying you need to have an IQ of 130 to be socially acceptable, I'm pointing out that people who never stop to think about wider consequences, about the world as a whole, and about society (and what they're doing to it), don't deserve to be a part of it [gasps at harsh reality!]. Clarkson, like many other great speakers, isn't afraid to speak out against this sort of social liability, or to voice an actual opinion, on any number of matters, that so few people are even capable of FORMULATING. And whether or not you agree with him, you can't possibly deny that if everyone thought a little harder, maybe shouted a bit louder, and used their common sense a bit more, there'd be far less Health and Safety executives and the world would (probably) be a shinier place.

With more adrenalin.

And less hippies.

Ah well...

"Life is a comedy for those who think... and a tragedy for those who feel." Horace Walpole